Populisms

unsplash-image-jMUrthkbNO0.jpg

Proliferating discussion of populism—in both right and left variants—often relates its rise to digital networks and platforms. We think this connection holds, but in manifold ways. The digitization of capital’s circulatory paths has played an important role in the deindustrialization, financialization, and changes in class composition underlying the explosion of populisms. Social media and mobile networks have then famously given populisms a voice, largely outside of the circuits of legacy media, as “digital parties” (Gerbuado 2016). And populist parties in sight of power then propose policy changes to the governance of digital capitalism, be it in in the direction of regulation or deregulation. Paradoxically, populist parties adept in the use of social media also often ride diverse and contradictory waves of “techlash” voicing suspicions of Big Tech. In all these respects, the combination of platforms and populisms is integral to a “crisis of hegemony” (Fraser 2017) destabilizing the political landscape of twenty-first century capitalism.


Neopopulism as a Problem: Between Geopolitics and Class Struggle*
Nick Dyer-Witheford Nick Dyer-Witheford

Neopopulism as a Problem: Between Geopolitics and Class Struggle*

Tackling the theme of neopopulism - a term that will be justified in the exposition - means to face off against a series of obstacles, that make very difficult a debate that can assume it as a theoretical-critical object. This is not only about the media and academic mainstream which - apart from some timid cues from political sociology - is and remains incised in the liberal discourse, the more empty the more pervasive it is in public space. Nor just about the impossibility/incapacity of the left, be it liberal or radical, to reflect on the conditions of its own sunset. It is that any analysis of the phenomenon in a critical perspective does not have in front of it, and presumably will not have for a long time, a potentially political collective subject to leverage on, in order to make the analysis politically "expendable".

Read More